Ubiquitously perfect practice: all the time from every single teacher

Posted on Updated on

Very often the argument about evidence-based practice is a deceptively simple one: tell teachers what works best and they will do it. Why wouldn’t they? Ok – teachers  may be involved to some extent in the research design, setting questions and organizing methods, or more often – involved in providing data as sites of experimentation or intervention. But once results are collated and analysed – they are presumably fed back to teachers as a series of pedagogic instructions: teacher proof pedagogy.

Surely this move is a continuation of the long standing ‘discourse of derision’ to which teachers have been subject for some years?  They can not be trusted to teach, they are poorly trained, they lack knowledge, they are all left wing progressives  – that sort of thing. So what we need is science. Science will instruct them.

But pedagogic practice is more complicated than that. In this table adapted by Frank Coffield from the work of Robin Alexandra,  changed slightly by me – teaching is argued as the outcome of a multi-layered filtration process which shapes practice across a number of different dimensions.

Evidence is part of the process but even if the ancient art of positivism is accepted as having some value –  it is not the only thing that can (or indeed should)  define practice.

Values   which define how and what we accept, gather and analyse as

Evidence   which is selectively drawn upon to shape what becomes and is experienced as

Policy Pressures   which are mediated, translated, interpreted by situational

Pragmatics  which is influenced by and influences our

Conceptions of Teaching and Learning which evolve with time, experience and the communities we work alongside to determine our

Practice  which is not just what happens in the class room, it is multi-dimensional construct, including

Context, Knowledge, Curriculum, Pedagogy, management, Students, CPD, Society

Coffield, F., & Edward, S. (2009). Rolling out ‘good’,‘best’and ‘excellent’practice. What next? Perfect practice?. British Educational Research Journal, 35(3), 371-390.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s